The Unconstitutional Usurpations of Government Bureaucracies

According to CNSnews U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis signed “partnership” agreements with ambassadors from a group of Latin American nations aiming to protect what she described as the labor rights of both legal and illegal migrants working in the United States.

During the signing ceremony hosted at Labor Department headquarters in Washington D.C., Solis said the agreements are aimed at educating migrant workers, regardless of how they got here, about their rights under U.S. law and to help prevent them from being abused in the workplace, either through wages, loss of job, or deportation.

When asked by, she made clear the agreements aim at protecting both documented and undocmented workers inside the United States.

Here’s the problem.  Once again, an agency is setting policy without going through Congress which is the legislative branch of government.  The Department of Labor is basically side-stepping the Constitution to enact Labor Laws by subverting the Constitutional authority that grants such privileges only to Congress.

The Department of Labor isn’t alone.  The Department of Education, the EPA and just about every bureaucracy in Washington passes laws, mandates and regulations, all sidestepping Congress, the only branch of the government with legislative authority. Presidents in both parties have been abusing this power since Theodore Rossevelt and its a convenient way for Constitutional abuses since none of these appointed officers in these agencies are sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution or to respect the Constitutions of each of the States.

Another aspect of this is that in granting rights to illegals, we are demonstrating a disrespect for the laws of another territory or country.  Liberals used to call this sort of thing Empire Building.  An illegal not only violates the Laws of this country by entering here illegally, they have also fled their own country illegally.  By granting them the rights of a U.S. citizen without making them accountable to uphold the laws of immigration there is no accountability to a rule of law.  If the laws concerning immigration do not have to be upheld, why would any other laws matter?

Certainly from a humanitarian perspective, immigrants fleeing abuses in their homeland should have a clear path to legalized immigration but that is not what we are seeing.   An undocumented person in this country may be a criminal fleeing the persecution of the law in their own land for things like theft, drug-trafficking, rape and murder.  By refusing to prosecute illegals we are also subverting justice for these individuals where some have simply repeated a criminal lifestyle in this country.

With the Department of Welfare extending benefits to illegals, the Department of Health mandating healthcare to illegals and the Department of Education insisting on the educational rights of illegals compounded by the Department of Justices refusal to deport illegals, even when they have committed other crimes besides violating our borders, is it any wonder why so many are wondering what happened to the Constitution in the United States.

Congress may think that they are absolved from any blame with this situation but they are the ones who should be demanding that this authority be returned to them.  By not insisting this authority returns to its Constitutional Limits, they might be able to blame the President and his administration but Congress has a responsibility to abide by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution and they can exert that influence by denying funding to these unconstitutional actions of government agencies and bureaucracies. In funding them, they are allocating spending for an agency that is blatantly disregarding the laws of this country as well as adding unnecessary financial burdens on individual  states and municipalities.

So who pays for all of this? The middle class bears most of the burden.  Corporations and businesses will pass on the cost of these mandates and regulations through the price of their goods and services.  That’s not greed, that’s good business sense.  They aren’t in business to go bankrupt or operate at a loss.  Profits help keep a corporation updated to run a more efficient business as well as to provide more jobs.  In order to stay in business they must allocate the costs associated with compliance to these mandates, rules and regulations to their product.  In the end, the consumer will pay for any cost associated and the majority of that cost is absorbed by the middle class.  The rules, regulations and mandates result in higher prices for goods and services while at the same time creating a greater need for municipalities to increase taxes.

On the other end of the scale is the problem of constantly expanding the entitlements.  Those receiving the entitlements are not paying for the services they receive, again the middle class is largely footing this bill. The governments solution of just printing more money results in a deflated value for the dollar basically meaning your dollar will buy less while you are faced with rising costs for essential needs like food, clothing and your own healthcare.

All of this to fund a people who refuse to abide by the rule of law in the country and enter here illegally.  While some might consider this humanitarian, is it also humanitarian to take from the labor of one to provide for another who has broken the rule of law without any consequences for their actions?  Is it humanitarian to demand that one family sacrifices to provide for another who has violated the laws for entering this country legally?

Families of 4 earning under $50,000 are now eligible for Food Stamps. This is basically the government admitting that their policies have failed the working middle class and created an economy that is destroying the middle classes ability to provide for their family.  We are already seeing the median income of American’s dropping while the poverty level is increasing.  That is exactly why we keep hearing the word unsustainable in regards to the economy.

So who benefits?  Certainly some might say the poor and illegals are benefiting that isn’t the reality.  The rules, regulations and mandates incur costs that smaller business can not absorb as readily as major corporations.  The smaller business must raise prices sooner and this places them in a precarious position of pricing themselves out of business effectively removing their ability to provide competition against major outlets.  This effectively hinders free market principles and allows corporations like GE and major players like Warren Buffet to profit at the expense of the investments of smaller companies which are still providing the majority of jobs in this country.  While Imhelt and Buffett are claiming that the government should raise their taxes, while at the same time both are avoiding paying taxes, there is more to the story.  They do not want higher taxes because they are benevolent.  They want higher taxes to put their competition from smaller companies out of business  This administration calls for higher taxes on those corporate jet flying moguls.  This class warfare rhetoric sounds good to a struggling family.  But this taxation involves raising taxes on businesses earning more than $250,000 effectively punishing them and thereby working towards removing any competition in the market for the major players.  That taxation will not hurt the major jet flying moguls but it will shut down smaller businesses.  That is corporate greed and it is using the government to manipulate the market rather than allowing for the market to be driven by free market principles.  Major corporations can move their operations to other countries where they incur lower wages and less regulations while the smaller company can not.  Major companies can absorb the abuses of Union Pressure to higher wages and generous benefit packages where smaller companies often can not.  All of this being controlled by Government Agencies and Bureaucracies through rules, regulations and mandates where the abusers are rewarded by removing the base of competition.

The poor and illegals also suffer through this by being able to purchase less with the money they are given.  This keeps them poor and unable to break free of the entitlement state.  Fro most surviving through entitlements, they can not afford to get out of the system.  First, there aren’t enough jobs being made available that will pay enough to break from this mold while also having to pay for child care and the rising costs of food, energy and clothing.  All the war on poverty did was make it more expensive to be poor.  When the war on poverty began the median poverty level for a family of 4 was $3000, now its $23,000.  That $23,000 doesn’t buy anymore than the $3,000 did, in fact, today it buys less due to higher prices for food, clothing, housing, and energy. While the cost of being poor has greatly increased the percentage in poverty has changed relatively little and in recent years, that percentage in increasing.

Until this usurpation of powers is put to an end things will not get any better for the average American and more people will find themselves needing government assistance to survive.  Instead of solving problems we create new problems that are more expensive to resolve.

Sowing Seeds of Hate

On your right to disagree: In a free and republican government, you cannot restrain the voice of the multitude: every man will speak as he thinks, or more properly without thinking. – George Washington

During an event called Kitchen Table Summit, Maxine Waters helped to bring the words of Washington alive for a new generation as she spoke, once again, without thinking.  “I’m not afraid of anybody,” said Waters. “This is a tough game. You can’t be intimidated. You can’t be frightened. And as far as I’m concerned, the ‘tea party’ can go straight to hell.”

This is not the first time Maxine Waters has gone public and spoke without thinking.  Remember this gem “And guess what this member* would be all about? This member would be all about socializing — er, uh. [Pauses for several moments] …. would be about … [pause] … basically … taking over, and the government running all of your companies.”

Despite the gap of time between those two statements, they are both inexorably connected. You have to really HATE somebody to publicly proclaim your desire that they go straight to hell.  Going to straight to hell is to go to hell in urgency, to take a straight course without deviation.  Her desire is not that they would eventually wind up in hell, but that they go now, directly without pause to a place of torment.

The seeds of socialism were planted years ago in America and the tree began to grow, bearing fruit.  It is now harvest time for the Progressives and America is discovering that this harvest is not only difficult to swallow but actually a poison.  Those who have sown these seeds have invested much of their lives and fortunes working the fields of socialism and rather than face their failures and admit that their harvest will kill us the progressives have resorted to any tactic they can grasp to destroy anybody who exposes the fruit of their labor for what it really is.

The goal of the Progressive has been to replace the tree of liberty that once feed this nation.  The seeds of that tree were planted in the harvest fields of Plymouth and as the tree grew it spread through Boston and the northern States.  It reached out to Philadelphia and then began to spread over the South.  By the mid 1800’s it had covered this land and began to bring freedom to the blacks and rights to women. The tree of Liberty was a new tree made by looking back through history and grafting onto this new tree the strongest and most principled values from the champions of Liberty from the dawn of time realizing that true Liberty comes from the people and giving them a power over their government.  They taught that hard work, virtue and morality brought true Freedom and the great experiment of America proved it to be true.  They taught that individual Liberty has a responsibility to respect the Liberties of others.  Individual Liberty lifts up others to Liberty and does not prey upon the rights of others to accomplish what it must..

This was more than the Progressives could stand so they grouped and they grafted from the trees of tyrants and fools from the ancients.  They embraced the philosophies of those who had littered their fields with the blood of their own people in order to grasp a power over the people through governance.  They taught that through sloth, ignorance and immorality freedom could somehow be obtained.  It was a only a form of freedom that leads to slavery since an immoral society will collapse under the weight of its own decadence.  In order to pursue immorality requires the need to prey upon the souls of others to feed their own immorality.

Tyranny, Anarchy, or Liberty: The Choice is Ours.

The Tea Party Movement was born out of a reaction to an abuse of power.  The Obama Administration pushed a piece of legislation that quickly became known as Obamacare and in one overwhelming unconstitutional sweep the alarm clock went off for many Americans.  It was too much, too fast.  While the birth of the Tea Party came at this moment in time, its conception was accomplished long before.

For years they had been slowly moving in our midst, nudging, then nudging a little more.  We knew it was wrong, we knew the things they were doing was beyond the scope of Constitutional powers but we were busy with our lives, too busy to care enough to do something about.  It wasn’t like they didn’t make great leaps in the past but those leaps were always associated with a crisis; Wars, depressions, national emergencies. During those times the government moved and pushed and we all too willingly stepped aside thinking the government had our best interest at heart yet at the same time there was something in the pit of our stomach that just didn’t seem right.

Obamacare was something different.  The Administration had no crisis to respond to, they had an agenda.  Obamacare would pass. They would climb any wall ”If we can’t climb the wall, we will jump over it. If we can’t jump over it, we will pole vault over it. If we can’t pole vault over it, we will parachute over it, but whatever it takes to pass the Health Care Legislation, we will do it!” or so Nancy Pelosi claimed to America.

Abuses of this sort of power are becoming more commonplace, or perhaps we are just more aware, more alert to the abuses.  Yet at the same time, within the rank and file of Tea Party groups were continue to see those who would rise from within our midst to lord over us, and all too often we willingly settle and allow these things to happen, not really realizing the dangers until the damage is finished.

Without a moral compass to guide us, the power of the Tea Party will be no different than other powers that seek to control government to their own purposes and goals.  If we undertake an anything goes mentality to obtain the victory; if the end justifies the means; the victory is a hollow one.  All we have done is exchanged one form of abuse with another.

The Tea Party rose to cry for the rule of Law of the Constitution but would we violate the Constitution to get what we want.  The Tea Party rose to cry for Liberty, but would we deny the liberty of another to obtain what we desire.  These are serious questions we must continue to ask ourselves.

More than 100 years ago Abraham Lincoln addressed the subject of Liberty.  He said:

The world has never had a good definition of the word liberty, and the American people, just now, are much in want of one. We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing. With some the word liberty may mean for each man to do as he pleases with himself, and the product of his labor; while with others the same word may mean for some men to do as they please with other men, and the product of other men’s labor. Here are two, not only different, but incompatable things, called by the same name———liberty. And it follows that each of the things is, by the respective parties, called by two different and incompatable names———liberty and tyranny.

The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep’s throat, for which the sheep thanks the shepherd as a liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the same act as the destroyer of liberty, especially as the sheep was a black one. Plainly the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of the word liberty;

Liberty never means the freedom to take from another concerning that which they are unwilling to yield. Our personal Liberty is dependent upon the respect of the Liberty of others. Once we deny the Liberty of others, we become the tyrants. We must stand firm against those who would deny the Liberty of others. When one individual or group of individuals seeks to take from another by force, intimidation or oppression and we remain silent, we speak; and the silence of our voice is shattering.

Sadly, we would surrender Liberty, if it means ease in obtaining something we desire at the expense of others.  True, it is not our own Liberty we surrender but we would take hostage the Liberty of others or at least allow for the Liberties of others to be abused.

Lincoln skillfully captures the essence of that which we should guard ourselves against.  True Liberty that is pure cannot survive in anarchy. Anarchy is not Liberty.  Liberty requires rules to protect against the abuses of selfish pursuit.  There is a sense of the collective to Liberty in that Liberty cannot truly abide where there is only Liberty for some, and not for others.  If the expressions of one individual’s Liberty imposes upon the Liberty of another than this is not true Liberty.  The one who desires to abuse another may claim personal Liberty but those whom he abuses, where is Liberty for them?

In the debate of entitlements we understand this within the context that it is immoral to take or demand from one to provide for the needs of another.  At the same time we accept that it also immoral to ignore the needs of others.  That which, on the surface, seems to be paradoxical is only a paradox if we allow the frame of the discussion to go outside the parameters.

When the government exceeds their authority to demand from one group to provide for the needs of another group, Liberty is denied one group to provide, not liberty, but material goods.  Giving an individual something for free is not the same thing as giving an individual the freedom to obtain something.  This is especially true if the item that is perceived to be free has come at the cost of taking it from another without their consent.  In the real world we recognize this as theft.  To add to the immorality, by taking from one to provide for the other, you deny the person you are taking from a portion of the right to give freely where they choose.

Liberty also means the freedom to fail.  When you take from one to provide for another to “create a level playing field” you deny one the right to succeed based on their labor while denying the other the right to fail even if they have willfully followed a path to failure.  In such interference, you are manipulating the results by punishing the success of one individual while rewarding the failures of another.  This is not Liberty for anyone yet this is exactly where we have arrived as a society.

Charity, or the individual right to provide for the needs of others, is essential to the survival of a humane society.  When a mediator comes on board to declare for Charity, is ceases to be charity.  First, the mediator is not making the sacrifice; they are seeking the sacrifice of others. The mediator seeks to escape their personal responsibility by meeting a need through the labor of others.  While not engaging any real sacrifice from their own person, what right would the mediator have to expect it from others? Charity only exists where there is personal and willing sacrifice.  Government by its nature can never provide for Charity because it always requires the sacrifice of those supporting the government to provide the means for that which the government calls charity.  They must take to give and this is not Charity.  In charity the Government can never lead by example, only the individual can do this in the realm of Charity and true Liberty would require for the provision for the maximum opportunity for the individual to do exactly that.  It is an abuse of the government’s power to claim to provide charity when they are demanding sacrifice of all but themselves.

Abuses of these powers do not exist solely in government.  Abuses of powers exist in religions, institutions and organizations permeating almost every level of society.  As we witness government using crisis, often creating the crisis in the first place, we need to recognize that individuals use the same tactics to implement abuses in power. We often see this in religions. They will point to problems even if they must exaggerate them, predict doom and then claim to hold some mystical key to biblical interpretation that only they understand.  They tell us that if we diligently apply their unique formula, we will find salvation.  If the problem still exists after applying their formula, it is always because we have somehow failed, never because their mystical formula is wrong.  At the core is a cry for the sacrifice of others while the caller benefits, either through notoriety or financial gain.

The magic formula doesn’t exist any more than the magic pill the snake oil salesmen used to sell solved all your medical woes.  The magic pills were only temporary distractions and those magic pills often only made the problems worse.

To the abusers of power, everything must be more complicated that it really is.  They must make you feel that you are inadequate for the task of solving problems so they add layers of unnecessary steps to finding solutions.   You cannot possible understand the complexities of the problem.  You must be told what to do and even if you are already doing that, you must be wrong because you aren’t following their prescribed formula.  You must never be allowed to believe that you are capable, that you are adequate enough to make the changes that are necessary. The only way you will ever be adequate is to take a spoonful of Dr. Elitism’s magic formula and carefully follow the instructions, never deviating from them, no matter what new problems you encounter and you will find success.   Is it any wonder so few are willing to get engaged when this is what we have been indoctrinated to believe?

The Slippery Slope of Moral Decline!

As the debate on gay marriage continues, opponents pointed to the slippery slope asking where it will all end.  In spite of the fact that there is no scientific evidence of a gay gene that causes a person to be “born that way”, the arguments in favor always comes back to the notion of the “gay gene” in that the people can not help themselves.  Opponents asked if pedophilia would be accepted as a norm based on the premise that these individuals are born that way and “can not help themselves”.  It would appear we are getting the answer.  After the recent release of the most current version of the publication the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) which holds and supports that pedophilia is a mental disorder, advocates fighting for the “rights” of pedophiles are fighting back.

This past Wednesday there as a conference in Baltimore MD hosted by a pedophile advocacy group called B4U-ACT.  Pedophiles don’t like the name,  they prefer to be called Minor-Attracted Persons which allows them to use the acronym MAP to cloak what they are really talking about.

World Renowned sexologist Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University gave the keynote address, saying: “I want to completely support the goal of B4U-ACT.”

Highlights of the conference:

  • Pedophiles are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society.
  • There was concern about “vice-laden diagnostic criteria” and “cultural baggage of wrongfulness.”
  • “We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child’s sexuality.”
  • “Children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult.
  • “In Western culture sex is taken too seriously.”
  • “Anglo-American standard on age of consent is new [and ‘Puritanical’]. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They’ve always been able to have sex at any age.”
  • An adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.”
  • Our society should “maximize individual liberty. … We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty.”
  • “Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization.”
  • “These things are not black and white; there are various shades of gray.”
  • A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
  • Dr. Fred Berlin acknowledged that it was political activism, similar to that witnessed at the conference, rather than scientific considerations that successfully led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder: The reason “homosexuality was taken out of DSM is that people didn’t want the government in the bedroom,” he said.
  • Dr. Berlin appeared to endorse the politically maligned clinical practice of “reparative therapy” for homosexuals and pedophiles alike, saying, “If someone, for their own reasons, doesn’t want to live a homosexual lifestyle, I tell them that it’s hard but I’ll try to help them.”
  • The DSM ignores that pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adult heterosexuals and homosexuals have romantic feelings for one another.
  • “The majority of pedophiles are gentle and rational.”
  • The DSM should “focus on the needs” of the pedophile, and should have “a minimal focus on social control,” rather than obsessing about the “need to protect children.”
  • Self-descried “gay activist” and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be “the object of our attraction.” He further objectified children, suggesting that pedophiles needn’t gain consent from a child to have sex with “it” any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it. He then used graphic, slang language to favorably describe the act of climaxing (ejaculating) “on or with” a child. No one in attendance objected to this explicit depiction of child sexual assault.

The above list describing highlights of the conference originated in a report by child advocates Matt Barber, Vice President of Liberty Counsel Action, and Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting law professor at Liberty University School of Law.

While all of these points in the discussion are alarming the comment that a child should not have to consent any more than we get consent from a shoe to wear it is vile.  It is evil.  The twisting of the motion of liberty in another statement also sickens me.  Our society should “maximize individual liberty. … We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty.”

Yesterday Glenn Beck addressed an audience in a powerful message that called for Christians to Stand with Israel against aggression that is calling for the extinction of the Jewish people from the face of the earth.  We should and we must make such a stand but it cannot stop with our responsibility to the rights of Israel.  The progressives have assaulted our institutions of learning and have aggressively sought to remove the morality of Judeo-Christian Values from our dialogue.  They have fought long and hard to re-interpret the moral codes of scripture but scripture does give an explanation as to why this sort of depravity exists.

In Romans chapter 1 we read this:

18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done.

Progressives have fought long and hard to translate our rights in the realm of the obligation to take from one to provide for the needs of others.  This is antithetical to historical rights as based on Judeo-Christian Values.  No one has the right to take in order to give, Judeo-Christianity teaches we have a responsibility to give to meet needs of others but that should come of free-will.

In perverting moral truths based on Judeo-Christian Values, the concept of sin is eliminated.  Sin almost always requires participation from a second party.  You can not murder, commit adultery, covet, steal unless there is a second person.  In doing so you are denying the rights, the liberties of the other to provide for your own desires.  That is not liberty, that is pure selfishness.  Liberty must be for all or there is no liberty.

That is why violence can not be part of how we express ourselves in our struggle to preserve the spirit of liberty.  We can not claim to proclaim liberty by taking from another through force or intimidation.  At the same time, we must stand and declare for liberty when any people seek to remove or prey upon the rights of others.  Liberty and responsibility and essential partners.  The claim of the pedophile that they have a right to destroy the innocence of children is not simply immoral.  There is no Liberty in this because in order to fulfill this act you must prey upon the rights of others.  It is violence.  It is abuse.  It is evil.

Violence is the last recourse and only in self-preservation.  We have an obligation to defend our persons, our family and our property against the abuses of others.  True Liberty proclaims the desire for Freedom for all and it stands for Peace for all.  The rights of the individual has nothing to do with anarchy when everyone has individual rights.  True Liberty and Individual Rights are sisters. It has nothing to do with spreading the wealth around  to create a level playing field.  That denies one the right to succeed through their accomplishments as well as the other the right to fail according to their actions.

In the case of pedophilia, the rights of the child are denied and dismissed.  These advocates in favor of this abomination are the bastard children of the abortion movement who have spread their disease of destroying childhood. In the pursuit of their selfish desires they have surrendered their will to evil.  They have given victory to the enemy of the soul in that surrender.  They have exchanged God, to raise themselves up as their own gods, not only to decide what is moral for themselves but to demand others to submit and surrender to their desires as well and then to argue that this is morality that must be embraced by all to allow them to continue in this pursuit.  They are not so blind that they do not realize the error in this logic.  They can not deny, when faced with the challenge of the rights of others, that to claim this as liberty is a contradiction because it requires theft from another…in this case a most precious commodity, the theft of sexual innocence and purity.

As we face the possibilities of economic collapse we understand that it has come at the result of abuses to fiscal policy.  We use words like unsustainable and we fully understand the implications of that word.  If it can not be sustained it will collapse.  Laws, mandates, regulations have all been abused to contribute to this and these laws are not moral laws because while appealing to ethical standards for the laws, they deny Liberties guaranteed to us by our Creator.  In attempting to create social justice they have created injustice and it has bankrupted America and will yield financial ruination for all to provide for those who will not provide for themselves.

An even greater threat faces the world in this attack on moral directives of Judeo-Christian Values.  It is the logic that leads us to foolishly believe in a social gospel where it is the government responsibility to demand we provide for others rather than rely on our personal responsibility to meet those needs.  They do not appeal to the good in us, they demand it and in doing so they become theives.  The Progressives would have us become animals, not relying in intellect and reason but to  debase us to lust and instinct.  If this social morality continues it will bankrupt the all morality in society in such a way that the heart of this nation will embrace evil and surrender the will to do good to the desire to do evil.  In turning perpetrators of evil into the victims and ignoring the real victims, innocence, not only of our children, but all innocence will die.

Inherent Racism and the Stockholm Syndrome

Last night radical leftist Janeane Garofalo implied that Herman Cain is suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.  She spoke about the inherent racism of the Republican Party.  This is a favorite tool of the liberal progressives.  They like to throw out words that make them appear to be intellectuals so no one stops to think about what they are saying.

First Stockholm Syndrome is a term used to describe a real paradoxical psychological phenomenon wherein hostages express empathy and have positive feelings towards their captors, sometimes to the point of defending them. Second to claim something that the Republican Party has inherent racism is to say the racism is an historically permanent characteristic or attribute of the Republican Party.

One of the reasons liberal Progressives have this innate desire to rewrite history is that there is so little in history that affirms their claims.  In fact, when empty intellectual heads like Garofalo claim something to be true, most often, historically, the exact opposite is true.

The history of the Democratic Party is rife with Racism.

If you are offended by that image you should be.  History shows that the Democratic Party had a clear racist agenda using the issue of “States’ Rights” to defend their alleged right to claim and own slaves. From 1792 to 1865 they passionately fought to preserve the institution of slavery.  Then in 1854 the Republican Party arose with one of its strongest platforms standing for the end of the cruel practice of human slavery.  They met with immediate opposition from the Democratic Party who enacted Fugitive Slave laws.  They instigated the Dred Scott decision in 1856 which legally classified blacks as property.  They fought for the Missouri Compromise in an attempt to spread the institution of slavery into the new Northern States and further solidified this position in the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

In 1861 Northern Democrats became known as “copperheads” in their attempts to appease the South through a negotiated peace which would have allowed blacks to remain in slavery.  These “copperheads” were responsible for several acts of violence against blacks in the north, murdering and maiming blacks in virtually every Northern state.  Anti-Civil War Democrats in New York engaged in “Four Days of Terror” against the city’s black population from July 13-16, 1863, and the anti-Civil War chant of the Democrats, as reported by one Pennsylvania newspaper, was: “Willing to fight for Uncle Sam”, but not “for Uncle Sambo.”

After the Civil War, the Republican Party pushed to amend the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment); passed the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875; and designed Reconstruction, a ten-year period of unprecedented political power for African Americans.  After the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, a democrat, became President during which time the Democratic Party fought to end Reconstruction passing repressive new laws that were known as Black Codes and Jim Crow Laws.

In 1866 the Ku-Klux Klan was formed by Democrats at a Tennessee Social Club in an attempt to use militant authority to harass blacks and Republicans in the South.

In 1894 the Democrats repealed all civil rights laws that had previously been passed and pushed even further in 1896 to enact the “separate but equal” segregation doctrine.  Segregation became the prevailing race policy for Democrats throughout the first half of the 20th century.  In 1912 when Democrat President Woodrow and Congress was controlled by the Democrats, all black American civil employees where pushed out of federal government jobs, and the greatest number of bills proposing racial segregation and discrimination were introduced than had ever been proposed in our nation’s history.  Not to be outdone, Franklin D. Roosevelt banned black American newspapers from the military because he was convinced the newspapers were communists and rejected anti-lynching laws pushed by Republicans, as well as efforts by Republicans to establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission that did not get established until 1958 under Republican President Dwight Eisenhower.

To combat the pressures from the Ku Klux Klan and the Democrats the NAACP was formed by three white Republicans, Oswald Garrison Villard, Mary White Ovington and William English Walling on February 12 1909.  The first black general secretary of the NAACP was black Republican James Weldon Johnson in 1920.

It was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960 and 1964, as well as the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.  Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a former “Keagle” in the Ku Klux Klan, made a 14-hour filibuster speech in the Senate in June 1964 in an unsuccessful effort to block passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In 1968 Alabama’s Democrat Governor George C. Wallace started the American Independent Party that attracted other racist candidates, including Democrat Atlanta Mayor Lester Maddox.

Republican President Richard Nixon established Affirmative Action as a merit-based system to help African Americans prosper with his 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation’s first goals and timetables, as well as his 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act that made merit-based Affirmative Action programs the law of our nation, but Democrats then fought hard to turn Affirmative Action into an unfair quota system not based on merit.

Democrat Senator Robert Byrd who was a fierce opponent of desegregating the military (something that happened under Democratic President Woodrow Wilson) complained in one letter: “I would rather die a thousand times and see old glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again than see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen of the wilds,”

Democrats did not denounce Democrat Senator Christopher Dodd who praised Senator Robert Byrd as someone who would have been “a great senator for any moment,” including the Civil War; yet Democrats denounced Senator Trent Lott for his remarks about Senator Strom Thurmond who was never in the Ku Klux Klan and, after he became a Republican, defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats.

Democrats today have continued to demean and discriminate against blacks including. Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy who called black judicial nominees “Neanderthals;” Democrat Senator Harry Reid who slurred Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as someone who could not write good English;  Vice President Joe Biden, while a Democrat Senator boasted that his home state of Delaware was a slave state and slandered all black former presidential candidates (Rep. Shirley Chisholm who became the first black and the first woman to run for president in 1972; Senator Carol Mosely Braum; Rev. Jesse Jackson; and Rev. Al Sharpton) by declaring that Senator Barack Hussein Obama (the son of an white American woman and a man from Kenya) is the first “clean” black presidential candidate; Democratic Party operatives who depicted Maryland Lieutenant Governor Michael Steele on the Internet as a “Simple Sambo;” cartoonist Jeff Danziger and Pat Oliphant who portrayed Secretary of State Dr. Condoleezza Rice as a “stooge” and a bare foot, “Ignorant Mammy;”  Senator Hillary Clinton who set the tone for the current race-based slander when she insulted Mahatma Gandhi of India who was a role model for Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. by calling Gandhi a gas station attendant; and President Bill Clinton who – following in the footsteps of his mentor J. William Fulbright, a staunch segregationist –  was himself sued for discriminating against his black employees while he was the Governor of Arkansas.

There is inherent Racism in one Political Party Ms. Garofalo and if the finger of a Stockholm Syndrome is to be pointed it is to all the blacks who continue to embrace a party who has had a long history of racial intolerance and has successfully managed to convince them that, while enslaving many blacks to a life of poverty, they will somehow free them from this lifestyle.

A Declaration for a New Generation

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Our Founders understood that any fine, fee, regulatory force or bribe extorted upon our industry to make us complacent to their rules was Taxation Without Representation if such duty did not originate from within our own elected and representative bodies.  Our Founders established a Constitution with language that limits the authority of the Executive Branch.  Ours was to be a government where laws concerning this country were established in Congress where the people had a voice and could remove the offending representative if they committed such egregious action.  Such is not the case with the Department of Welfare, the EPA, the Federal Reserve, the FDA, The Department of Education and countless other agencies overseen by appointments distributed as political favors.  They have no Constitutional, delegated or representative powers over us but this administration sees the limited powers granted to Government as a negative because it champions the rights of We the People. The Office of the President is the office of the executive branch.  His job is to enact and enforce the laws passed by Congress.  His job is NOT to bypass congress through agencies overseen by his Progressive friends and ignored or allowed by a dangerously silent Congress.

The history of the present Administration is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. The guilt rests not solely on their shoulders as previous Administrations secured the foundation but no other Administration has so recklessly or so boldly abandoned the principles upon which this Nation was founded.  To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

They have sought to destroy the economy to fund their personal re-election schemes in their struggle for power in a dangerous game of King of the Hill where they will push, trample and destroy anyone in their path to the top of the hill.

They have sought destroy the job market through over burdensome regulations without the consent of the people through agencies with no accountability to the people of this land.

They are surrendering the Sovereignty of the Nation by borrowing against a debt they cannot possibly repay and allowing foreign nations to possess large portions of that debt thus having control over our markets to benefit the foreign interests.

Through economic maneuvering they are collapsing and destroying the middle class.

They have betrayed the allies of our Country to befriend enemies who will never be a trusted ally under the current conditions of those nations.

They have engaged our bravest men and women in conflict while binding their hands thereby increasing the number of our wounded and dead.

They have apologized for our Nation for those times we were forced to defend our country and called it Empire Building.

They have demonized our country on the very blood stained soil in foreign nations where our bravest died fighting for the freedoms of others.

They have denied our country’s right to pursue energy Independence while using our monies to fund other countries who would  hold us hostage to their demands in energy prices.

They have proclaimed the rhetoric of class warfare and racism to incite the poor and misguided to acts of random violence while instilling in them the belief that they have a right to the labor of others with no accountability to their own industry.

They have stood before us and publicly declared that any attempts to secure the financial future of this country by cutting the egregious spending of a reckless and irresponsible Administration is a plot to destroy the industry in this nation while their policies and the historical record have demonstrated the exact opposition to be true.

They have claimed that fiscal accountability and responsibility is a plot to kill the elderly, thus creating unwarranted fear and anxiety in a people who have supported this Nation through their own industry and pursuits.

They have expanded dependency entitlements setting us on the Road to Serfdom that will deny us the rights guaranteed by our Creator.

They have encouraged the sale of weapons to enemies of our country that are used against our own citizens.

They have encouraged drug trafficking from Mexico into the United States enslaving our youth to a destructive lifestyle.

They have waged a cruel war against human nature itself, violating it’s most sacred rights of life and liberty to enslave a people in this new form of socialistic political serfdom.

The leader of this Administration, our President,  promised a united America and divided us more than we ever thought possible.

His was not a promise of hope but a demand that unity must comes at the price of free thinking people surrendering their will, their occupations and their service to his singular vision.  He promised hope and change and the fundamental transformation of America but he was not interested in what we hoped for, only what he hoped for and that is the complete surrender and servitude of the people to bow to his will and determination.

When states attempted to make their own land secure by enacting and enforcing laws already in our Federal Statutes, he accused our police officers of harassing innocent illegals who were out to buy their family an ice cream cone knowing full well that legal citizens in this country were being slaughtered on their own property and that immigrants were being held in hostage condition by illegal immigrant drug lords in houses on our very soil.  By refusing accent to the Law of the Land he has sanctioned the inhumane treatment of foreigners on our soil and the trafficking of human lives in ways not seen since the abhorrent practice of slavery. In ignoring and refusing to uphold Federal Laws concerning immigration and then demonizing those states that seek to secure safety for its citizens he has sanctioned the deaths, rape and violence committed by illegals on our own citizens.

They have identified those who would defend the Constitution and dare to speak out in peaceful opposition as terrorists without any evidence of violence or physical aggression while ignoring the real terrorists who are plotting the downfall of the American way of life. At the same time telling us we can no longer call Muslim extremists terrorists but must refer to them as “Militant” Muslims.  They ignore the intimidation and violent acts of Illegals, La Raza, the Unions and the Black Panthers yet accuse us of being a threat.  They have been embraced and endorsed by Communist activists groups but dare to call us the radicals.

By identifying us as the terrorists, this Administration, under the leadership of this President of the United States, has declared open and public war on us. This war is waged daily from this Administration though it’s political supporters and pundits and from the press as they seek to distort, to lie and destroy the character of any whom openly disagrees with them. They have publicly demanded that the media silence the voice of those who oppose them as being irrelevant thus violating the First Amendment of the Constitution.  By partnering with those who will not respect the rule of law, seeking to destroy its fundamental truths while holding to a most certain disdain for the Constitution and the principles and values of our Founders they have identified themselves as living in harmony with those who have sought to destroy the American Way of Life.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances through which our Nation was formed. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations. They have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.

Abraham Lincoln said “Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step over the ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! — All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a Thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

This is not about party.  This is about America and what it means to be American.

There is a war being waged for the heart and soul of this country.  Our future hangs in that balance.  Will we become part of this New World Order of Global Governance where unity requires that we must surrender and compromise the very things that made America the beacon of liberty to the world or will we retain our Sovereignty and remain the leader of the free world?  That is what is at stake!  This is what we are fighting for!

The Fabian Society and Its War On America

The Fabian Society and its War on America.


Today we hear a great deal about Progressives in America but fully understanding Progressivism begins through the exploration of its roots and those roots begin in The Fabian Society.  The Fabian Society began in England in 1887 by a relatively small group of intellectual elitists who embraced Marxist Socialism forced upon a society through slow gradual and incremental steps.  The logo (pictured above) is a symbol of the Fabian Society. One should immediately questions why an organization would consider using a shield that pictures a wolf in sheep’s clothing as an image to promote their beliefs and the answer should be an obvious one.  It is the arrogance of the intellectual elite.  More importantly though should be the question “If they are the wolf, who are the sheep?”

The gradual transition to a Marxist Socialist regime is also represented in another image popular with Fabian Socialists.

The Fabian’s gave this gradual change a policy directive. They called it:

“The Doctrine of Inevability of Gradulaism”

This doctrine established that “without breach of continuity or abrupt change of the entire social issue,” by infiltrating educational institutions, government agencies, and political parties. Prominent Fabian and writer, George Bernard Shaw, revealed that their goal was to be achieved by “stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its right name.”

George Bernard Shaw was a beloved satirist in England who is still noted for his wit and in educational circles, some of that wit is carefully concealed although Shaw himself never concealed his intent.

I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people who I might want to kill…I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might come before the income tax commissioner and say every 5 years or every 7 years…just put them there and say , ‘Sir or madam will you be kind enough to justify your existence…if you’re not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little bit more then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive. Because your life does not benefit us and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.’

-George Bernard Shaw

This is the core of Eugenics, or the philosophy of  applied science or the bio-social movement which advocates the use of practices aimed at improving the genetic composition of a population, usually referring to human populations.

Shaw also said “A part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber.  A great many people would simply have to be put out of existence simply because its wastes other peoples time to look at them”

Shaw is calling for the program implemented by Germany to purge its society of those the government deemed drains upon their society.  Shaw’s principles put into action gave birth to the gas chambers in Nazi Germany.

One principle the Fabians fully grasped was that to fundamentally transform Society it would be necessary to move that Society towards a Welfare State.  In order to accomplish this they understood that they had to change the dialogue to focus on the weaknesses in human nature in order to gain sympathy and popularity for this cause.  If they could manipulate societies, preying upon poor to use them to advance their causes, while at the same time preying upon the human nature by making them feel guilty and responsible for the condition of the poor they could accomplish the second phase of their goals.

The second phase is to replace Free Market Capitalism with State Capitalism.  They believed that State should control aspects of business such as electric power production, transportation, precious metals and of course, credit. The remaining balance of economic systems would be left to the private sector however; it, in their thinking, must be highly regulated by the State and operated according to the wishes of the State.

There is nothing tolerant about the Fabian Socialist, they are and were statists.  The long term goal was to delude the populace into believe that Democracy and Socialism were compatible while pushing towards a Socialistic Dictatorship through a legalistic view of morality where the individual is simply a part of a greater collective.  No individual has any worth except the worth that individual provides to the collective.  If the collective does not benefit from the individual than that individual has absolutely no worth.

It is obvious that Adolph Hitler yields what happens when this model is put in to practical purpose.  The only difference between the Fabian Society and Hitler was that they believed he moved to fast for society to accept their goals.

The philosophy was embraced by intellectual elitists in America.  Knowing that Socialist meant Communist in the average American mind and Communism was a known enemy of American Values, they could not identify themselves as being openly Socialist so they called themselves something different.  They used the word Progressive.

It was essential that, in order to establish global dominance through a world dictatorship, the principle of American Exceptionalism must fail.  In less than 100 years America had gone from being an upstart new Government to the leader of the principles of freedom and individual liberties and that this had given birth to an entrepreneurial spirit that had made the American dollar the standard of measurement for the value of world currency.

To the pure Socialist, this is unthinkable and unacceptable. This does not exemplify their collective will.  The free-market ideology must be forced to collapse.  If society was to be purged from the undesirables, a system had to come into place that would replace the free market individualism to remove competition from the largest corporation while at the same time regulating those large corporations to comply with a word governance ideology.  They could not have competition; they must regulate to create the level playing field.

In order to accomplish this the conversion of America from the viewpoint of free market Capitalism to State Capitalism, something had to be done to collapse American economy from a market that could function prosperously without Government interference into a country that would become dependent upon the government in order to maintain its power that would be equally beneficial to both the Corporate power structure and the Government.

At the same time, the Government needed to replace the spirit of entrepreneurialism of the individual with a Welfare State of dependency.  This would call for a dramatic shift of the paradigm within the realm of the intellectually elite in this country.  In the most daring strategy of the Fabian Progressive movement, the spirit of Charity through moral conviction of the individual had to be replaced with the mandated theft of monies to create a dependent society in what Hayak referred to as the Road to Serfdom.

The wolf needed to identify the flock that it was going to feed upon in order to accomplish that aim and this task fell upon Margaret Sanger.

Margaret Sanger, the mother/founder of Planned Parenthood who has successfully deceived the masses into embracing them as holding compassion for the poor, made her intentions clear but few then and now listened to her intent.  Modern Progressives seek to hide what Sanger said in public because in this politically correct world, the real heart and spirit of her words betray the aims and goals of the image Planned Parenthood had fabricated for themselves.   Consider these three quotes from Sanger.

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying … demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism … [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”

“Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems”

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

To implement this Eugenic Control of Society, the wolf recognized the sheep it needed to devour.  Again, quoting from Margaret Sanger:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Sanger’s ideology was radical for its time and the fact that so many of her supporters choose to ignore these statements from her demonstrates that her direct attempts at the Eugenic destruction of the black race and those that were identified as the social morons and dredges of society by the intellectually elite was never realized.  That is not to say it was not tried.  Through Sanger’s progressive ideology several states adopted a forced sterilization program that resulted in in the sterilization of an estimated 60,000 Americans.

The concept of the turtle moving slowly replaced Sanger’s radical Hitleresque destruction of classes that was deemed non-productive towards meeting the Fabian ends.

In order to replace entrepreneurialism the first step had to be to find a way to remove the competition of the free market system by replacing it with a governmentally controlled economic standard.  Enter the Federal Reserve.

While the excuse of a depression was its impetus, the goal of its establishment is evidenced in its results.  The Federal Reserve could now control and regulate Wall Street through economic manipulations in implementation of interest rates, securities and bonds.   The Authority of the Federal Reserve, while supposedly separate from the powers of Congress, falls under an appointed office through the Presidency effectively now giving the President some control over market fluctuations and pricing.

A new way of manipulating the market had to be developed and this fell to a man named John Maynard Keynes

Keynes stated “Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become ‘profiteers,’ who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.”

This new philosophy of economics is now referred to as Keynesian and is the only method of economics that the liberal progressives embrace in spite of its continual and historic evidence of complete failures.

The economic manipulations of the Federal Reserve were not enough though.  The President’s powers had to be extended to other institutions and this was realized through FDR’s New Deal.  The New Deal was the brainchild of a man named Stuart Chase. Stuart Chase was a member of the Fabian Society at Harvard University.

He laid out the basis of the New Deal.  The New Deal would empower the President through newly created agencies run by appointed positions to manipulate the government’s regulations of the business world effectively choosing which companies would fail and which would succeed through fees, duties and regulations.

The New Deal was only Stuarts short term goals.  The long term goals were established in 1942 through a book he wrote entitled “The Road We Are Traveling”.  In it he laid out the Fabian/Progressive plan for the future of America

  1. A strong, centralized government.
  2. An executive arm growing at the expense of the legislative and judicial arms.
  3. The control of banking, credit and security exchanges by the government.
  4. The underwriting of employment by the government, either through armaments or public works.
  5. The underwriting of social security by the government – old-age pensions, mothers’ pensions, unemployment insurance, and the like.
  6. The underwriting of food, housing, and medical care, by the government.
  7. The use of deficit spending to finance these underwritings.
  8. The abandonment of gold in favor of managed currencies.
  9. The control of foreign trade by the government.
  10. The control of natural resources.
  11. The control of energy sources.
  12. The control of transportation.
  13. The control of agricultural production.
  14. The control of labor organizations.
  15. The enlistment of young men and women in youth corps devoted to health, discipline, community service and ideologies consistent with those of the authorities.
  16. Heavy taxation, with special emphasis on the estates and incomes of the rich.
  17. Control of industry without ownership.
  18. State control of communications and propaganda.

Perhaps the most egregious part of this movement has been the way in which the government has become the Fabian Society in its deluding the poor into believing they are the Savior of the poor while the plan all along has been the fattening of the sheep to prepare society to accept their annihilation so openly embraced by the likes of Shaw, Sanger and others in the foundation of the Progressive movement.

We are on the precipice.  Have you ever believed that the government needs to step in and do something about the reckless morality of many in our society who bear more children than they can support?  Isn’t this exactly one of the excuses used by Progressives embracing Pro-Choice position to justify the wholesale slaughter of the most innocent among us?

As we watch the downward spiraling of our economy, would we justify purging those who contribute less or nothing by our estimation in order to preserve our own existence?

This has been the trail of the Fabian turtle in its slow path towards The Doctrine of Inevability of Gradulaism. The journey of this turtle does not end with the surrender of moral values and replacing them with Fabian intellectualism in America.  The turtles journey ends when this is the rule for the world and this can only be accomplished by the fundamental transformation of America.

The most dangerous things to human sanctity is that Progressives believe this is compassion.  Their understanding about compassion is vastly different from our own but to help us all understand how they define compassion consider this quote in 2010 for progressive author and commentator Virginia Ironside

“If a baby’s going to be born severely disabled or totally unwanted, surely an abortion is the act of a loving mother. If I were the mother of a suffering child – I mean a deeply suffering child – I would be the first to want to put a pillow over its face…My feeling of horror at suffering is much greater than getting rid of a couple of cells. If it was a child I really loved, who was in agony, I think any good mother would.”

That, my friends is Progressive compassion.  “My Feeling of horror at suffering is much greater than getting rid of a couple of cells.”

Hello world!

Welcome to After you read this, you should delete and write your own post, with a new title above. Or hit Add New on the left (of the admin dashboard) to start a fresh post.

Here are some suggestions for your first post.

  1. You can find new ideas for what to blog about by reading the Daily Post.
  2. Add PressThis to your browser. It creates a new blog post for you about any interesting  page you read on the web.
  3. Make some changes to this page, and then hit preview on the right. You can always preview any post or edit it before you share it to the world.