H.R.748 – To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 25 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or as civilian service in a Federal, State, or local government program or with a community-based agency or community-based entity, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, to provide for the registration of women under the Military Selective Service Act, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES!.
Sponsor: Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-13] (Introduced 02/15/2013)
Latest Action: 02/15/2013 Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Rangel was found guilty of 11 ethic violations that would have landed a normal citizen in Federal Prison. According to section 7201 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), it is a federal crime for anyone to willfully attempt to evade or defeat the payment of federal income taxes. A conviction for tax evasion can carry with it up to a five-year prison sentence and/or fines up to $100,000. It would seem that the same laws do not apply to good time Charlie! Charlie Rangle was Censured!
In the House of Representatives, censure is essentially a form of public humiliation carried out on the House floor. As the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives reads out a resolution rebuking the member for the specified misconduct, the member must stand in the House well and listen to it. This process has been described as a morality play in miniature.
In the history of the House, censure has been used 23 times, and most of the cases arose during the 19th century. In the modern history of the United States House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct (since 1966), censure has been used five times, most recently against Charles B. Rangel.
The censure was not so humiliating for Rangel that it has stopped him from trying, through Legislative active, to socially engineer the moral conduct of our young people by giving them a choice – be drafted or join a Civilian Youth Corp.He also wants his bill to be so encompassing that the draft can be used for military selective service AND OTHER as yet undefined PURPOSES.
Rangel has a history of trying to re-institute the draft but this latest bill sounds like he is trying to help Obama achieve his campaign goal of a Civilian Security force that is just as powerful and just as well-funded as our Military Forces. That force has been a subject of concern by many Americans.
Watch Video Here: http://youtu.be/Tt2yGzHfy7s
In 1973, at the end of the Vietnam War, Congress abolished the draft in favor of an all-volunteer Army (AVA). A common complaint at the time was that the draft unfairly targeted minorities. Today the same criticism is launched at the all-volunteer Army because its ranks of minorities are disproportionate to the general population.
The expansion of the government interference into the daily lives of Americans has reached an all-time high that is even trying to regulate those areas that were solely left to the realm of Charity. It is one thing to proclaim that we have a social responsibility towards the care of others, it is quite another thing to mandate it. This then ceases to be Charity since the individual is not acting by their own inner compulsion. Millions of Americans engage in volunteer acts in their community without government interference every year.
Obama’s Civilian Security Force is something very different and beckons back to the Hitler Youth of Nazi’s rise in Germany. The Hitler Youth Camps became indoctrination centers where children were encouraged to out anyone, including their parents, if they so much as complained about the new Government, Speaking of Indoctrination, in spite of the lamestream media’s attempts to tell us that Nazi’s weren’t Socialists the term NAZI was coined from their own description of the Party; Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers’ Party)
The Hitler Youth had been created in the 1920’s. By 1933 its membership stood at 100,000. After Hitler came to power, all other youth movements were abolished and as a result the Hitler Youth grew quickly. In 1936, the figure stood at 4 million members. In 1936, it became all but compulsory to join the Hitler Youth.
There were separate organizations for boys and girls.
Boys joined the Hitler Jugend (Hitler Youth) until the age of 18. In 1936, the writer J R Tunus wrote about the activities of the Hitler Jugend. He stated that part of their “military athletics” (Wehrsport) included marching, bayonet drill, grenade throwing, trench digging, map reading, gas defence, use of dugouts, how to get under barbed wire and pistol shooting.
Girls joined the Bund Deutscher Madel (League of German Girls). A popular poster for the movement showed a young girl with the words “Every girl belongs to us” inscribed on the poster.
The Hitler Youth Movement was originally overseen by Baldur Benedikt von Schirach. In 1940 he organized the evacuation of 5 million children from cities threatened by Allied bombing. Later that year, he joined the army and volunteered for service in France, where he was awarded the Iron Cross before being recalled. Schirach turned control of the Hitler Youth to Artur Axmann, and was appointed Governor (“Gauleiter” or “Reichsstatthalter”) of the Reichsgau Vienna, a post in which he remained until the end of the war. During that time Schirach was responsible for sending Jews from Vienna to German death camps. During his tenure 65,000 Jews were deported from Vienna to Poland, and in a speech on 15 September 1942 he mentioned their deportation as a “contribution to European culture.”
There are many Americans today, just as there was Germans before the rise of Nazis and the Hitler Youth movement, who say that something like this could never happen, not here. Unfortunately when we fail to learn lessons from history we become ripe for a repeat of the same course of action. Many Americans are in sad need of a refresher course in History, not the modernist revisionist history that has permeated out public schools but actual history.
Those who repeat the mantra that it can’t happen here, not in America. Take a moment and consider that National News Broadcasters have boasted on television that they are, in fact, Socialists. Socialism is a system of economics that is alien to free-market capitalism, the institution of economics instituted at the origin of our government. As America moves more towards Socialism we move further away from truly American Principles of Government. This shift is a direct result of the modern revisionists reinterpretation of history that has worked to indoctrinate America into to a system where it’s all about the economy while avoiding the importance of the protection of Private Property Rights.
Socialism and communism are ideological doctrines that have many similarities as well as few real differences. One point that is frequently raised to distinguish socialism from communism is that socialism generally refers to an economic system, and communism generally refers to both an economic system and a political system. The means of production are publicly owned (as in owned and regulated by the State) in both systems, but the ways that money and resources are distributed is different. In socialism, each person is allotted resources according to his or her input, or amount of work, and in communism, each person is allotted resources according to his or her needs.
Take a moment and listen to what these socialist commentators are advocating for as they help advance Obama’s class warfare rhetoric. Is it redistribution allotted to his or her input or is is it redistribution according to his or her needs? Socialism recognizes Private Property, but embraces that all industry must be owned by the Community or State. Communism rejects all rights to private property where evertyhing, including you, is the property of the State. Institutionalized Communism is the extreme wing of Socialism.
Hitler and other Socialists before him understood that humans are instilled with certain rights that they will fight to preserve. They also understood that the only real way to change this was through a system of indoctrination to quite literally brainwash the people to reject this concept and they knew it had to start when they were still children. For adults, fear had to be instilled with the direct consequences of worst kind. to any who opposed the new National Socialist order.
This can only be accomplished by removing their ability to defend themself and to make it possible for a government to detain its citizens through unlimited detention without due process.
In 1928, the German government enacted the Law on Firearms and Ammunition. This law put into effect a strict firearm licensing scheme. Under this scheme, Germans could possess firearms, but they were required to have separate permits to do the following: own or sell firearms, carry firearms (including handguns), manufacture firearms, and professionally deal in firearms and ammunition.
The 1938 German Weapons Act superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to “…persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit.”
Under both the 1928 and 1938 acts, gun manufacturers and dealers were required to maintain records with information about who purchased guns and the guns’ serial numbers. These records were to be delivered to a police authority for inspection at the end of each year. Government workers, and National Socialist German Workers Party members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. A legal distinction was made between guns for sport and guns for self-defense. On November 11, 1938, the Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick, promulgated Regulations Against Jews’ Possession of Weapons because the Jews were seen as antagonistic to the National Interest and Security of Germany. This regulation effectively deprived Jews of the right to possess firearms or other weapons.
Does any of this sound familiar to the modern rhetoric being used by this administration to further regulate firearm use? Do you still think the Civilian Security Force can’t happen? Then consider this:
The first Nazi concentration camps were erected in Germany in February 1933 after Hitler became Chancellor and his National Socialist German Workers Party was given control over the police through Reich Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick and Prussian Acting Interior Minister Hermann Göring. The camps were used to indefinitely detain German Citizens who were seen by the State to be political opponents and therefore a threat to the State. Leaders who organized and openly criticized the State were rounded up and detained in these camps. It did not start with the Jews. The camps held around 45,000 prisoners by 1933 and were greatly expanded after the Reichstag fire of that year.
Heinrich Himmler’s SS took full control of the police and concentration camps throughout Germany. It was then that Hitler allowed Himmler to start using the camps’ facilities and personnel to purge German society of so-called “racially undesirable elements” that included Jews and criminals. Between 1939 and 1942 during World War II, the number of camps exploded to more than 300, as political prisoners and “undesirable elements” from across Europe were mass-incarcerated without due process. The State had declared them as a threat and therefore they were criminals.
The National Defense Authorization Act was originally instituted to be a United States federal law specifying the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense. After the attacks on the World Trade Center the NDAA was expanded to include provisions for the unlimited detainment of terrorists. The passage of the NDAA in 2012 was harshly perceived by the American people but it was still signed into law with a promise from this president that he would not use the authority. That was hardly enough since it essentially admits the power is there. The NDAA was amended for 2013. In the amendment Congress included a provision, Sec. 1029, that states that “any person inside the United States” is guaranteed the right of habeas corpus.
The added provision has, however, come under criticism. Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) criticized the provision, saying, “The new language [that] ensures the right to habeas corpus (the right to be presented before a judge) is both questionable and not enough. Citizens must not only be formally charged but also receive jury trials and the other protections our Constitution guarantees. Habeas corpus is simply the beginning of due process. It is by no means the whole.”
In the report commissioned by the Department of Homeland Security “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970… written by Gary LaFree and Bianca Bersani, concluded that single issue groups as terrorists. Among these “terrorists” included are “fundamentalists”, “anti-abortion advocates” and those “suspicious of centralized federal authority” as potential sources of terrorism.
“The most recent decade has been dominated by single issue attacks,” they wrote.
Possible terrorists aligned with the “extreme right-wing” are described as “nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation), anti-global, suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty, and believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”
Beneath the seal of the DHS, the report states it was compiled to “aid the intelligence and law enforcement communities in identifying potential terrorist threats and support policymakers in developing prevention efforts.”
LeFree and Bersani drafted the paper for the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Ter… at the University of Maryland, which received an initial grant of $12 millin dollars from the DHS to carry out research on terrorism.
An April 2009 DHS report entitled “Rightwing [sic.] Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate… identified “groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration” and opposition to same-sex “marriage” as “the most dangerous domestic terrorism threat in the United States.” The DHS later pulled the report.
Yet DHS and FBI agents subsequently attended a terrorism training seminar on alleged pro-life terrorism, hosted by Planned Parenthood, the National Abortion Federation, and the Feminist Majority Foundation. After equating free speech with violence, organizers distributed a resource guide listing three pages of purportedly extremist websites such as Priests for Life, the American Center for Law and Justice, and the Christian Broadcasting Network.
Constitutional expert John Whitehead o The Rutherfors Institute has voiced concern the 2012 National Defense Authoration Act (NDAA) “would allow the military to show up at your door if you’re a ‘potential terrorist,’ and put you in military detention.”
So, DO YOU STILL THINK IT CAN’T HAPPEN HERE, NOT IN AMERICA?
Agenda 21 is the UN Agenda for the 21st Century. Here, in their own words, is the defense of Sustainable Development:
“Land…cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice.” From the report from the 1976 UN’s Habitat I Conference.
“Private land use decisions are often driven by strong economic incentives that result in several ecological and aesthetic consequences…The key to overcoming it is through public policy…” Report from the President’s Council on Sustainable Development, page 112.
“Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the UN’s Earth Summit, 1992.
In their attempts at indoctrination to their cause they understand the our system of government must be changed:
“Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project
“We must make this place an insecure and inhospitable place for Capitalists and their projects – we must reclaim the roads and plowed lands, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres or presently settled land.” Dave Foreman, Earth First.
“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy- fixated groups and individuals in our society… This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” J. Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development.
Agenda 21 is happening. It is well-documented and it is being implemented through Federal Regulation to the State and Compliance by our States through regulation down to the local level. It seeks to remove private property rights and turn all property in public use land. Since 1998 literally hundred of attempts to get Sustainable Development laws enacted have been made at the Federal Level, some of the successful.
in the 265 page document that lists only the bill title and summary U.N. Agenda 21 “Sustainable Development” Introduced in the U.S. Con…: you can read about each of these legislative efforts.
Still Not Convinced:
#1 All 50 U.S. states are now constructing federally-mandated databases that will track the behavior and performance of all public school students in America throughout their entire school careers. According to the New York Post, the Obama administration wants to use the information that is gathered for a wide array of purposes….
The administration wants this data to include much more than name, address and test scores. According to the National Data Collection Model, the government should collect information on health-care history, family income and family voting status. In its view, public schools offer a golden opportunity to mine reams of data from a captive audience. (source)
#2 All over America, school children are being immersed in the radical green agenda. In fact, in many areas of the country children are actively trained to watch how their parents behave and to correct them when they are being “environmentally unfriendly”. The following is from a recent New York Times article about this phenomenon….
“I have very, very environmentally conscious children — more so than me, I’m embarrassed to say,” said Ms. Ross, a social worker in Dobbs Ferry, N.Y. “They’re on my case about getting a hybrid car. They want me to replace all the light bulbs in the house with energy-saving bulbs.”
Ms. Ross’s children are part of what experts say is a growing army of “eco-kids” — steeped in environmentalism at school, in houses of worship, through scouting and even via popular culture — who try to hold their parents accountable at home. Amid their pride in their children’s zeal for all things green, the grown-ups sometimes end up feeling like scofflaws under the watchful eye of the pint-size eco-police, whose demands grow ever greater, and more expensive.
Later on in that same article, a district superintendent is quoted as saying that they try to inject the green agenda wherever they can into the curriculum….
“We’re trying to integrate it into anything where it naturally fits,” said Jackie Taylor, the district’s superintendent. “It might be in a math lesson. How much water are you really using? How can you tell? Teachers look for avenues in almost everything they teach.” (source)
#3 One 13-year-old student in New Mexico was recently handcuffed and forcibly removed from a classroom just because he burped in class. In all, over 200 students in Bernalillo County “have been handcuffed and arrested in the last three years for non-violent misdemeanors”. (source)
#4 All over America, students are being taught that the First Amendment does not apply in public schools. Expressions of free speech in school are often cracked down upon very hard. For example, one group of high school athletes was recently suspended for “Tebowing” in the hallways of their school. (Source)
#5 Many public school sex education classes have totally crossed the line. Instead of just “educating” children about sex, many sex ed courses are now “indoctrinating” children about sex. One recent example of this was detailed in the New York Times….
IMAGINE you have a 10- or 11-year-old child, just entering a public middle school. How would you feel if, as part of a class ostensibly about the risk of sexually transmitted diseases, he and his classmates were given “risk cards” that graphically named a variety of solitary and mutual sex acts? Or if, in another lesson, he was encouraged to disregard what you told him about sex, and to rely instead on teachers and health clinic staff members?
That prospect would horrify most parents. But such lessons are part of a middle-school curriculum that Dennis M. Walcott, the New York City schools chancellor, has recommended for his system’s newly mandated sex-education classes. There is a parental “opt out,” but it is very limited, covering classes on contraception and birth control. (source)
#6 Sadly, this “sexual indoctrination” appears to be working. According to one recent study, sexual conduct between teen girls in the United States is now at the highest level ever recorded. (source)
#7 Putting kids in jail has become standard operating procedure in the United States. Today, nearly one-third of all Americans are arrested by the police by the time they reach the age of 23. At this point, the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world and the largest total prison population on the entire globe, and yet our society just continues to become more unstable. (source)
#8 In some U.S. schools, RFID chips are now being used to monitor the attendance and movements of children while they are at school. The following is how one artticle recently described a program that has just been instituted at a preschool in California….
Upon arriving in the morning, according to the Associated Press, each student at the CCC-George Miller preschool will don a jersey with a stitched in RFID chip. As the kids go about the business of learning, sensors in the school will record their movements, collecting attendance for both classes and meals. Officials from the school have claimed they’re only recording information they’re required to provide while receiving federal funds for their Headstart program.(source)
#9 Increasingly, incidents of misbehavior at many U.S. schools are being treated as very serious crimes. For example, when a little girl kissed a little boy at one Florida elementary school recently, it was considered to be a “possible sex crime” and the police were called out. (source)
#10 In Texas the crackdown extends all the way down to elementary school students. In fact, it has been reported that Texas police gave “1,000 tickets” to elementary school kids over a recent six year period. (source)
#11 Our children are being programmed to accept the fact that they will be watched and monitored constantly. For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is spending large amounts of money to install surveillance cameras in the cafeterias of public schools all across the nation so that government control can closely monitor what our children are eating. (source)
#12 If you can believe it, a “certified TSA Official” was recently brought in to oversee student searches at the Santa Fe High School prom. (source)
#13 Last year, a 17 year-old honor student in North Carolina named Ashley Smithwick accidentally took her father’s lunch with her to school. It contained a small paring knife which he would use to slice up apples. So what happened to this standout student when the school discovered this? The school suspended her for the rest of the year and the police charged her with a misdemeanor. (source)
#14 In some U.S. schools, armed cops accompanied by police dogs actually conduct surprise raids with their guns drawn. In the following video, you can actually see police officers aiming their guns at school children as the students are lined up facing the wall.
#15 The U.S. government is now encouraging children to spy on their parent as part of the “war on terror”. If a school official hears that a parent has said the “wrong thing” at home, that parent could potentially get labeled as a “potential terrorist”. (source)
#16 A high school student in Southern California was suspended for two days because he had private conversations with his classmates during which he discussed Christianity. He was also banned from bringing his Bible to school ever again. (source)
#17 Back in 2009, one 8 year old boy in Massachusetts was sent home from school and was forced to undergo a psychological evaluation because he drew a picture of Jesus on the cross. (source)
#18 Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli announced that school officials can search the cell phones and laptops of public school students if there are “reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is violating either the law or the rules of the school.” Nothing like indoctrinating them, early into NDAA submission. (source)
Still thinking it can’t happen here in America……then no amount of evidence will convince you of the obvious.